Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752548AbdLEEg6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:36:58 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:41994 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752143AbdLEEgy (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:36:54 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZd6TwGPpUSHWTcO8oqyZ5ae+w8ffGml2XDsTWok4f+q+TySAc/pRbPJunz/K7O1/pSI3SV9g== Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:36:54 -0800 From: Nicolin Chen To: Timur Tabi Cc: broonie@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, caleb@crome.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Refine all comments Message-ID: <20171205043653.GA13204@Asurada-Nvidia> References: <1512420403-10164-1-git-send-email-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <1512420403-10164-5-git-send-email-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <8e5229a8-5f3f-d55f-95dc-2b33657b9c9a@tabi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8e5229a8-5f3f-d55f-95dc-2b33657b9c9a@tabi.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1231 Lines: 27 On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:04:57PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 12/4/17 2:46 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote: > >This patch refines the comments by: > >1) Removing all out-of-date comments > >2) Removing all not-so-useful comments > >3) Unifying the styles of all comments > >4) Simplifying over-descriptive comments > >5) Adding comments to improve code readablity > >6) Moving all register related comments to fsl_ssi.h > >7) Adding comments to all register and field defines > > > >Even after adding dozens of lines in fsl_ssi.h, this patch reduces > >100 lines totally. > > I'll review the other patches later, but I'm not keen on your > removal of some of the comments in this patch. I don't see why line > count is so important, and you're removing some informative text. I That's okay. That's why I included recent contributors to review. > can see removing trivial comments and outdated ones, but > "no-so-useful" and "over-descriptive" are subjective. I agree. I am just being very aggressive here to clean up the driver in any inch that I feel it's possible to simplify. If any one has a concern about certain parts of the removal, it's okay to justify for it. I will revise it to get more informative while being concise.