Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:53:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:53:07 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:36651 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:53:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 20:52:46 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Tim Riker Cc: Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: non-gcc linux? Message-ID: <20001102205246.A17332@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <3A01B8BB.A17FE178@Rikers.org> <20001102201836.A14409@gruyere.muc.suse.de> <3A01BDCD.FCBCFFF8@Rikers.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3A01BDCD.FCBCFFF8@Rikers.org>; from Tim@Rikers.org on Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:17:33PM -0700 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:17:33PM -0700, Tim Riker wrote: > [..] by adding gcc > syntax into it [..] I think that's the right path. How much would be hard for you to add gcc syntax into your compiler too instead of feeding us kernel patches? Note that it would be a big advantage also for userspace (not only kernel uses inline asm and other gcc extensions). And probably it would be an improvement to your compiler too (since I don't know of other compilers that are as smart as gcc in the inline asm syntax :). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/