Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 14:11:39 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
        sboyd@codeaurora.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        keescook@chromium.org, msalter@redhat.com, labbott@redhat.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/20] arm64: entry: Add fake CPU feature for
 unmapping the kernel at EL0
Message-ID: <20171206141138.33mw3tmhwfuh6x3y@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1512563739-25239-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
 <1512563739-25239-17-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1512563739-25239-17-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 605
Lines: 20

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:35:35PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> +static bool unmap_kernel_at_el0(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry,
> +				int __unused)
> +{
> +	/* Forced on command line? */
> +	if (__kpti_forced) {
> +		pr_info("kernel page table isolation forced %s by command line option\n",
> +			__kpti_forced > 0 ? "ON" : "OFF");
> +		return __kpti_forced > 0;
> +	}

I think we want this to be a pr_info_once() so that we don't print this
for late-onlined secondaries due to verify_local_cpu_features().

With that changed:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.