Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270561AbTGNHap (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 03:30:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270562AbTGNHap (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 03:30:45 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:31908 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S270561AbTGNHao (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 03:30:44 -0400 From: Nikita Danilov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16146.24474.707720.580442@laputa.namesys.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:45:30 +0400 To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: utimes/futimes/lutimes syscalls In-Reply-To: <20030711224210.6fee6a73.akpm@osdl.org> References: <3F0F9B0C.10604@redhat.com> <20030711224210.6fee6a73.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: ed | telnet under Fuzzball OS, emulated on Emacs 21.5 (beta14) "cassava" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 24 Andrew Morton writes: > Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > > > If > > there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this > > is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives) > > cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I > > still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be > > that urgent. > > XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make > this change. so does reiser4. > - Nikita. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/