Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752452AbdLGAtw (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:49:52 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:6651 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752160AbdLGAtv (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 19:49:51 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,370,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="10310198" Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is_uncore to detect PMU UNCORE devices To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , jnair@caviumnetworks.com, Zhangshaokun , Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Robert Richter , "Jin, Yao" References: <20171016183222.25750-1-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> <20171016183222.25750-4-ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com> <6fdad34d-1612-0447-e58e-5c748f92668d@linux.intel.com> <1f79aa3c-a061-7c55-5d3e-f13638be01ad@linux.intel.com> <20171205184242.GA19952@kernel.org> <71db0255-af9b-968a-7baa-238d7146f069@linux.intel.com> <20171206134702.GA12234@kernel.org> From: "Jin, Yao" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 08:49:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171206134702.GA12234@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 848 Lines: 31 On 12/6/2017 9:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 08:30:37AM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: >> >> >> On 12/6/2017 2:42 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:35:22PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: >>>> A quick test with the new patch 'fix_json_v9_2.patch' shows it working. >>> >>> I'll take this as a Tested-by: you, ok? >> >> Hi Arnaldo, >> >> I didn't do a full test for this patch and for the whole patch series. >> >> I just do a quick test and it shows that the regression issue which was >> found in 'perf stat --per-thread' test case is disappear. >> >> If you think it's enough for adding Tested-by, that's fine for me. :) > > I guess this addresses at least your previous regression report, so I > think it is warranted, thanks! > > - arnaldo > That's fine, thanks! Thanks Jin Yao