Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:54:49 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads
Message-ID: <20171207092449.hncv4aldaum5wivg@vireshk-mac-ubuntu>
References: <20171130114723.29210-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20171130114723.29210-7-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
 <20171130134155.GF9903@localhost.localdomain>
 <20171130160234.GG31247@e110439-lin>
 <20171130161220.GK9903@localhost.localdomain>
 <20171130164237.GI31247@e110439-lin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171130164237.GI31247@e110439-lin>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 646
Lines: 18

On 30-11-17, 16:42, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 30-Nov 17:12, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Not sure about this though, not my call :). I guess this still helps
> > until we get the DL changes in.
> 
> Yes, agree... well Viresh had some concerns about this patch.
> Let see what he thinks.

And the problem is that we never got to a conclusion in V2 for this
patch as well, as you never responded to the last set of queries I
had. Unless we finish the ongoing conversations, we will have the same
queries again.

IOW, can you explain the exact scenario where this patch will be
helpful ? I am not sure if this patch is that helpful at all :)

-- 
viresh