Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:21:52 +0200
To: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>, torvalds@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XBox Gaming System subarchitecture.
Message-ID: <20030714142152.GC20708@h55p111.delphi.afb.lu.se>
References: <20030714124933.GB20708@h55p111.delphi.afb.lu.se> <20030714135948.GA27930@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030714135948.GA27930@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Anders Gustafsson <andersg@0x63.nu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1030
Lines: 27

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 02:59:48PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> First you should read (and preferably act upon) the comments
> sent the last time you posted this.
> 
> Notably the gcc 'workaround' and the HZ ifdef maze.

Ooops, wrong patch. I have a labyrinth of bitkeeper-trees here, all looking
almost the same.

The real patch contains cleaned up HZ-ifdefs.

Regarding the gcc "workaround" I said:

"I don't really know how to make clear it's not a gcc problem. But if it was,
 why doesn't it crash on pc and 1.0 xboxen? And why does it crash on kernels
 compiled with 2.95, with or without optimization? I really wish I had the
 explaination to this problem."
 
Or as Christoph answered: "Oh well, stupid crappy hardware..."

-- 
Anders Gustafsson - andersg@0x63.nu - http://0x63.nu/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/