Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755598AbdLGNYf (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 08:24:35 -0500 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:56395 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755528AbdLGNYb (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 08:24:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: stm32: Fixes multibyte transfer for STM32F4 I2C controller To: Wolfram Sang , =?UTF-8?Q?Rados=c5=82aw_Pietrzyk?= CC: Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM" , "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" , open list References: <1507722788-31224-1-git-send-email-radoslaw.pietrzyk@gmail.com> <990c3275-35b3-68da-453c-d1a80e867df7@st.com> <2d892fec-0496-8a6f-51c9-439b933d9975@st.com> <20171207105229.jxxyfofsgub27nip@ninjato> From: Pierre Yves MORDRET Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:23:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171207105229.jxxyfofsgub27nip@ninjato> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.44] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG5NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.13) To SFHDAG5NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.14) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-12-07_05:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 18 I do believe some investigation has to be done prior merging this patch. The impact is genuine and has to be tested thoroughly before granting an ack. Thus I prefer having a better understanding of the issue. I will try to work on this later on. Regards On 12/07/2017 11:52 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 01:45:43PM +0200, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote: >> I'm afraid that didn't help and the problem still exists even with >> those patches applied. > > So, my reading is: There is an issue which needs to be investigated? > Does applying the patch make sense until the issue is fully understood? >