Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754742AbdLGQwl (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:52:41 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:46226 "EHLO mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754416AbdLGQwj (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:52:39 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYaVgIx/vnweyh185vkLPwnbc2BNxSrtU8BvHb1jNAzcI8VLNwNCwAr2OOG43sIKPjhJqYseg== Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: tcb_clksrc: Fix clock speed message To: Nicolas Ferre , Romain Izard Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni References: <20171201122233.21828-1-romain.izard.pro@gmail.com> <6f3d309e-2e71-3f60-5910-0d8b1f051836@linaro.org> <99fd8a35-9522-bb80-9aea-e4c266cdbc62@microchip.com> From: Daniel Lezcano Message-ID: <4f811006-1c3e-f92c-7623-0839ddcd18de@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 17:52:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <99fd8a35-9522-bb80-9aea-e4c266cdbc62@microchip.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1212 Lines: 37 On 07/12/2017 17:34, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > On 07/12/2017 at 12:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 01/12/2017 13:22, Romain Izard wrote: >>> The clock speed displayed at boot in an information message was 500 kHz >>> too high compared to its real value. As the value is not used anywhere, >>> there is no functional impact. >>> >>> Fix the rounding formula to display the correct value. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard >>> --- >>> v2: rebase over v4.15-rc1 >>> >>> There is no specified maintainer for this file, only supporters. >> >> That is not correct, it defaults to Thomas and me, the maintainers of >> drivers/clocksource :) >> >>> Nicolas, could you pick this through the at91 tree as the TCB block >>> is an AT91 peripheral ? >> >> Nicolas, do you agree with this change ? If yes, I will take it. > > Yes, fine with me: > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre > > Thanks Daniel for the "heads-up". Thanks, applied 4.16. -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog