Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752852AbdLHJAt (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 04:00:49 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:36598 "EHLO mail-it0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752413AbdLHJAs (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 04:00:48 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZ8q1XHqGALWs7fj/EySh1zcPRS6GHjQJ4ji2Z9J9+c02MZM5VuOHwuBIJDjDDtB9sRlPj8ZTw2F+Oi0ObzOmo= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171208075134.GP5027@jhogan-linux.mipstec.com> References: <1512628268-18357-1-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> <20171207065759.GC19722@kroah.com> <20171207110549.GM27409@jhogan-linux.mipstec.com> <1512652210.13996.10.camel@flygoat.com> <20171207141829.GN27409@jhogan-linux.mipstec.com> <1512705706.1756.12.camel@flygoat.com> <20171208075134.GP5027@jhogan-linux.mipstec.com> From: Huacai Chen Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:00:46 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: t4OK3LNxAMsRNchtIGSZ4OfrkRE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] About MIPS/Loongson maintainance To: James Hogan Cc: Jiaxun Yang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Rothwell , Ralf Baechle , Rui Wang , Binbin Zhou , Ce Sun , Yao Wang , Liangliang Huang , Fuxin Zhang , Zhangjin Wu , =?UTF-8?B?546L6ZSQ?= , Aaron Chou , huanglllzu@163.com, 513434146@qq.com, David king <1393699660@qq.com>, Linux MIPS Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1939 Lines: 46 Hi, James, Of course we don't want to send PR directly, if there is a better way. So, I hope you can officially be a co-maintainer of linux-mips, and as a result, our community will become more active. I think most of MIPS developers have the same will as me. Huacai On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, James Hogan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:01:46PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: >> Also we're going to separate code between >> Loongson2 and Loongson3 since they are becoming more and more >> identical. > > Do you mean you want to combine them? > >> But It will cause a lot of changes under march of loongson64 >> that currently maintaining by linux-mips community. Send plenty of >> patches to mailing list would not be a wise way to do that. So we can >> PR these changes to linux-next directly and PR to linux-mips before >> merge window. > > For the avoidance of doubt, a pull request would not excempt you from > needing your patches properly reviewed on the mailing lists first. > > And quoting Stephen's boilerplate response to linux-next additions: >> Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As >> you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of >> linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of >> conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. >> >> You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have >> been: >> * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's >> Signed-off-by, >> * posted to the relevant mailing list, >> * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), >> * successfully unit tested, and >> * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. >> >> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him >> to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. > > Cheers > James