References: <20171129175605.GA863@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> <20171206234622.GZ3326@worktop> <87y3mf8f1j.fsf@ni.com> <20171207104516.ljmivyqx7yrthflu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171207142648.n4h3vzyajw2zlxv2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <87mv2ur3ew.fsf@kerf.amer.corp.natinst.com> <20171207195052.GG18445@jcartwri.amer.corp.natinst.com> <87lgieqgz3.fsf@kerf.amer.corp.natinst.com> <20171208124939.7livp7no2ov65rrc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.3.1
From: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex
In-reply-to: <20171208124939.7livp7no2ov65rrc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:04:19 -0600
Message-ID: <87k1xxqk8s.fsf@kerf.amer.corp.natinst.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:99
SpamDiagnosticMetadata: NSPM
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2017 16:04:23.9274 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1474c692-4cef-4728-d0d8-08d53e5559e9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 87ba1f9a-44cd-43a6-b008-6fdb45a5204e
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR0401MB3593
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-12-08_08:,,
 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=inbound_policy_notspam policy=inbound_policy score=30
 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0
 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0
 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=30 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1712080220
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 507
Lines: 18


Peter Zijlstra writes:

> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:02:40PM -0600, Gratian Crisan wrote:
>
>> Yep ... looks good to me. I've been running two targets with the
>> original reproducer for 8 hours now plus a target running the C test.
>> All of them are still going.
>> 
>> I'm going to let them run overnight to make sure but I'm going to call
>> it fixed.
>
> Assuming nothing bad happens; find below the patch with a Changelog
> attached.

Looks good after overnight testing. Thank you so much.

-Gratian