Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753518AbdLHWOo (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:14:44 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:9364 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753198AbdLHWOl (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:14:41 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,379,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="1248826" Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:14:40 -0800 From: "Luck, Tony" To: David Howells Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Does this break IA64 Linux? Message-ID: <20171208221439.ucfahr4gvv77jnsd@agluck-desk> References: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7B2CC912@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> <151274828931.9961.17801232134228415862.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <151274828194.9961.4230316917108602662.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <10175.1512748454@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <31453.1512759888@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31453.1512759888@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 479 Lines: 17 On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:04:48PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Luck, Tony wrote: > > > Which patch is "this patch". I don't see any link or attachment. > > Sorry, I cc'd a patch which I sent to the ia64 list. The 5th patch on this > branch: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=init_task > I pulled this branch and it builds on all of my ia64 test configurations. Boots too. So no ia64 breakage. -Tony