Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752312AbdLKEEl (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:04:41 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:57500 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752185AbdLKEEj (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:04:39 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:04:32 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20171210.230432.1241639159245478272.davem@davemloft.net> To: pravin.shedge4linux@gmail.com Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de, andrew@lunn.ch, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/45] net: remove duplicate includes From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <1512581578-6216-1-git-send-email-pravin.shedge4linux@gmail.com> <20171206.155830.1524390600502175582.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:04:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 897 Lines: 25 From: Pravin Shedge Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:30:21 +0530 > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:28 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Pravin Shedge >> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:02:58 +0530 >> >>> These duplicate includes have been found with scripts/checkincludes.pl but >>> they have been removed manually to avoid removing false positives. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pravin Shedge >> >> Networking patches need to be sent to netdev@vger.kernel.org >> >> Thank you. > > -- Adding netdev@vger.kernel.org for reviewing networking patches. Doesn't work like that. You have to post the actual patch freshly to the netdev mailing list so that it gets properly queued in patchwork and can be reviewed. You can't just add netdev to the CC: in a reply to my email, that doesn't do any good at all.