Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752460AbdLKKcl (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:32:41 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:55294 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750836AbdLKKci (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 05:32:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:32:30 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Yury Norov Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, szabolcs.nagy@arm.com, Heiko Carstens , Chris Metcalf , philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com, Joseph Myers , zhouchengming1@huawei.com, Steve Ellcey , Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, Andreas Schwab , Alexander Graf , Geert Uytterhoeven , Adam Borowski , manuel.montezelo@gmail.com, James Hogan , Chris Metcalf , Andrew Pinski , linyongting@huawei.com, Alexey Klimov , Mark Brown , Bamvor Zhangjian , Maxim Kuvyrkov , Florian Weimer , Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com, James Morse , Ramana Radhakrishnan , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/20] ILP32 for ARM64 Message-ID: <20171211103230.wzg4w6eybynzh5qf@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20170619155003.13218-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <20171116111130.f5xmomxgm234i6v7@yury-thinkpad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171116111130.f5xmomxgm234i6v7@yury-thinkpad> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 28 Hi Yury, On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:11:30PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > This is ILP32 patches on top of 4.14 kernel: > https://github.com/norov/linux/commits/ilp32-4.14 > > I tested the series with LTP lite built by Linaro toolchain, and no > regressions found. Thanks. I gave it a try as well with LTP and pushed a staging/ilp32-4.14 branch to the arm64 tree on git.kernel.org. BTW, you've added two random patches on top of this branch (which I removed). > By the way, do you have plans to upstream arch subseries? > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/25/574 I was hoping Arnd would pick them up since they are rather UAPI specific than arm64. BTW, I wonder whether the nds32 patches actually follow the proposed defaults in your patches like force_o_largefile() and get/setrlimit: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/27/474 (I haven't reviewed the nds32 patches in detail though) -- Catalin