Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:06:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712111155330.1699@nanos>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712111206040.1699@nanos>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711131222590.1851@nanos> <7c1dd011-0b7b-7c57-71ed-bfab8a52c888@mblankhorst.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711301005530.1925@nanos> <373cf597-c068-4c90-354c-496c88692f9f@linux.intel.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711302339270.2095@nanos>
 <c933a0e5-9fb4-9e47-775b-26e6a40525c5@linux.intel.com> <20171211100251.mzbynloyykoksbeq@phenom.ffwll.local> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712111155330.1699@nanos>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 505
Lines: 16

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small
> > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire
> > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected patch) is a bit
> > annoying.
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1712081129450.1840@nanos

Another question. Is this broken on mainline or just with your new bits
targeted for next?

Thanks,

	tglx