Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:20:59 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>, avagin@gmail.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, sramana@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency
Message-ID: <20171211152059.GH2421075@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
References: <CANaxB-zT+sz=z1FFk5npnwMySdfKCBZDkM+P+=JXDkCXbh=rCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1511868946-23959-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org>
 <623f214b-8b9a-f967-7a3d-ca9c06151267@codeaurora.org>
 <20171204202219.GF2421075@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <20171204225825.GP2421075@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <20171204230117.GF20227@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171204230117.GF20227@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 565
Lines: 18

Hello, Peter.

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:01:17AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > AFAICS, this should remove the circular dependency you originally
> > reported.  I'll revert the two cpuset commits for now.
> 
> So I liked his patches in that we would be able to go back to
> synchronous sched_domain building.

Ah, yeah, that's a separate issue but didn't we intentionally make
that asynchronous?  IIRC, cpuset migration can take a really long time
when the memory migration is turned on and doing that synchronously
could mess up the system.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun