Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752263AbdLKXgK (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:36:10 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:24675 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751554AbdLKXgH (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:36:07 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,393,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="2003904" X-Mailer: emacs 25.3.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Flavio Ceolin To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , Petr Cvek , Sakari Ailus , Niklas =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=B6derlund?= , Julia Lawall , Arnd Bergmann , "open list\:MEDIA INPUT INFRASTRUCTURE \(V4L\/DVB\)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: pxa_camera: disable and unprepare the clock source on error In-Reply-To: <4016874.2vIpU9bQLW@avalon> References: <20171206163852.8532-1-flavio.ceolin@intel.com> <1880720.cnKARQTyeT@avalon> <878te9561h.fsf@faceolin-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com> <4016874.2vIpU9bQLW@avalon> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:36:00 -0800 Message-ID: <87374g6dnj.fsf@faceolin-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2357 Lines: 68 Laurent Pinchart writes: > Hi Flavio, > > On Monday, 11 December 2017 23:05:46 EET Flavio Ceolin wrote: >> > On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 18:38:50 EET Flavio Ceolin wrote: >> >> pxa_camera_probe() was not calling pxa_camera_deactivate(), >> >> responsible to call clk_disable_unprepare(), on the failure path. This >> >> was leading to unbalancing source clock. >> >> >> >> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org). >> > >> > Any chance I could sign you up for more work on this driver ? :-) >> >> Definetely, this would be great :) > > Actually it looks like the work I thought was needed has already been > performed. The pxa-camera driver used to make use of the soc-camera framework, > which we are trying to remove, and occurrences of soc_camera in the code gave > me the wrong idea that the driver was still based on that framework. It seems > this isn't the case. Thank you for making me happy :-) I'm glad to hear it :) > >> >> Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart >> > >> > I expect Hans Verkuil to pick up the patch. >> > >> >> --- >> >> >> >> drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c | 4 +++- >> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c >> >> b/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c index 9d3f0cb..7877037 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c >> >> @@ -2489,7 +2489,7 @@ static int pxa_camera_probe(struct platform_device >> >> *pdev) >> >> dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, pcdev); >> >> err = v4l2_device_register(&pdev->dev, &pcdev->v4l2_dev); >> >> if (err) >> >> - goto exit_free_dma; >> >> + goto exit_deactivate; >> >> >> >> pcdev->asds[0] = &pcdev->asd; >> >> pcdev->notifier.subdevs = pcdev->asds; >> >> @@ -2525,6 +2525,8 @@ static int pxa_camera_probe(struct platform_device >> >> *pdev) >> >> v4l2_clk_unregister(pcdev->mclk_clk); >> >> exit_free_v4l2dev: >> >> v4l2_device_unregister(&pcdev->v4l2_dev); >> >> +exit_deactivate: >> >> + pxa_camera_deactivate(pcdev); >> >> exit_free_dma: >> >> dma_release_channel(pcdev->dma_chans[2]); >> >> exit_free_dma_u: > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart Regards, Flavio Ceolin