Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751581AbdLLIA5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:00:57 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:46018 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715AbdLLIA4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:00:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:00:53 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Zhang Rui Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Jarkko Nikula , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3 Message-ID: <20171212080053.GA7990@amd> References: <1578405.51lzoSX1jh@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171209103325.GA13867@amd> <20171209220110.GA11496@amd> <20171210162305.GA10159@amd> <20171210185638.GA10363@amd> <1513001367.2981.11.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1513001367.2981.11.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1450 Lines: 50 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > ...should take 10 seconds or so. > > I'm told 0day does *some* suspend/resume testing, but I think it's > > pretty limited, partly because the kinds of machines it primarily > > works on don't really support suspend/resume at all. >=20 > currently, we're running suspend test on 1 platform only, with 64 bit > kernel. suspend test will be enabled on more platforms (laptops) in > next two weeks. Thanks! > > I'm also not sure > > just how many of those machines are 32-bit at all.. >=20 > for this, I suppose it can be reproduced if we use 32-bit kernel and > rootfs, right? Then it's easier to enable this in 0Day. Yes, Intel cpus are pretty good at backwards compatibility, and most problems are not subtle at all. So yes, 32-bit kernel / rootfs on recent machine should be good for testing. Best regards, Pavel =09 --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlovjLUACgkQMOfwapXb+vJFxQCgv7TXhcV8h1v8j9SWqg/8k6P1 1cAAni7qtvoQMExZmkC+04bzFOPMy252 =kokH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--