Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751622AbdLLM7m (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 07:59:42 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34350 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754745AbdLLM7e (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 07:59:34 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Falcon , "David S. Miller" , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 105/148] ibmvnic: Allocate number of rx/tx buffers agreed on by firmware Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:45:15 +0100 Message-Id: <20171212124436.911175714@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.1 In-Reply-To: <20171212124431.207182779@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20171212124431.207182779@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3099 Lines: 89 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Thomas Falcon [ Upstream commit 068d9f90a6978c3e3a662d9e85204a7d6be240d2 ] The amount of TX/RX buffers that the vNIC driver currently allocates is different from the amount agreed upon in negotiation with firmware. Correct that by allocating the requested number of buffers confirmed by firmware. Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_open(struct net_devic send_map_query(adapter); for (i = 0; i < rxadd_subcrqs; i++) { init_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[i], - IBMVNIC_BUFFS_PER_POOL, i, + adapter->req_rx_add_entries_per_subcrq, i, be64_to_cpu(size_array[i]), 1); if (alloc_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[i])) { dev_err(dev, "Couldn't alloc rx pool\n"); @@ -419,23 +419,23 @@ static int ibmvnic_open(struct net_devic for (i = 0; i < tx_subcrqs; i++) { tx_pool = &adapter->tx_pool[i]; tx_pool->tx_buff = - kcalloc(adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq, + kcalloc(adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq, sizeof(struct ibmvnic_tx_buff), GFP_KERNEL); if (!tx_pool->tx_buff) goto tx_pool_alloc_failed; if (alloc_long_term_buff(adapter, &tx_pool->long_term_buff, - adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq * + adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq * adapter->req_mtu)) goto tx_ltb_alloc_failed; tx_pool->free_map = - kcalloc(adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq, + kcalloc(adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL); if (!tx_pool->free_map) goto tx_fm_alloc_failed; - for (j = 0; j < adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq; j++) + for (j = 0; j < adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq; j++) tx_pool->free_map[j] = j; tx_pool->consumer_index = 0; @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_xmit(struct sk_buff * tx_pool->consumer_index = (tx_pool->consumer_index + 1) % - adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq; + adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq; tx_buff = &tx_pool->tx_buff[index]; tx_buff->skb = skb; @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_xmit(struct sk_buff * if (tx_pool->consumer_index == 0) tx_pool->consumer_index = - adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq - 1; + adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq - 1; else tx_pool->consumer_index--; @@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ restart_loop: producer_index] = index; adapter->tx_pool[pool].producer_index = (adapter->tx_pool[pool].producer_index + 1) % - adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq; + adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq; } /* remove tx_comp scrq*/ next->tx_comp.first = 0;