Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268721AbTGOP5Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:57:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268715AbTGOP5Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:57:16 -0400 Received: from ns1.citynetwireless.net ([209.218.71.4]:42767 "EHLO mail.citynetwireless.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268745AbTGOP5L (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:57:11 -0400 Message-ID: <005b01c34aeb$e1c54e00$0500000a@bp> From: "Ro0tSiEgE LKML" To: Subject: -ac kernels Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:12:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 618 Lines: 12 What patches in the -ac kernels get put into the mainstream kernel? For instance, I would assume that fixes in 2.6.0-test1-ac1 would make it into 2.6.0-test2, but I'm not sure how that works, surely no one is just dropping those fixes and not applying them at some point to the mainline kernels. So I guess my question is, at what point does Linus' tree sync with Alan's? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/