Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268737AbTGOQXT (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:23:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268745AbTGOQXT (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:23:19 -0400 Received: from auth22.inet.co.th ([203.150.14.104]:14611 "EHLO auth22.inet.co.th") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268737AbTGOQXP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:23:15 -0400 From: Michael Frank To: Russell King Subject: Re: 2.5.75-mm1 yenta-socket lsPCI IRQ reads incorrect Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:09:07 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: linux-kernel , Pavel Machek , John Belmonte References: <200307141333.03911.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk> <20030715085622.A32119@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <200307151734.46616.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk> In-Reply-To: <200307151734.46616.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk> X-OS: KDE 3 on GNU/Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200307160009.08605.mflt1@micrologica.com.hk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1609 Lines: 52 On Tuesday 15 July 2003 17:34, Michael Frank wrote: > I believe it is not here now, we need to look elsewhere, as interrupts > stay dead also after reloading modules (see logs). > > Jul 15 17:06:43 mhfl2 kernel: Socket status: ffffffff FFFFFFFF!!!! This returns ffffffff too: cb_writel(socket, CB_SOCKET_MASK, 0x0); if ((temp = cb_readl(socket, CB_SOCKET_MASK)) != 0) printk("Yenta: probe can't write socket mask %x\n",temp); because the device is somewhat "passive" after a suspend.... Should we save all registers? - it has 128 It sits on the same bus with ide, e100 which work, so it won't be pci related - OK?. Another thing, even lspci returns crap after suspend because data come from RAM rather than device(s). I would like to do generic pci_save_state/pci_restore_state centraly in the pci driver. It would reduce other driver side work too. What is the possible downside of this approach and your opinion in general? Regards Michael -- Powered by linux-2.5.75-mm1. Compiled with gcc-2.95-3 - mature and rock solid My current linux related activities: - 2.5 yenta_socket testing - Test development and testing of swsusp for 2.4/2.5 and ACPI S3 of 2.5 kernel - Everyday usage of 2.5 kernel More info on 2.5 kernel: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt More info on swsusp: http://sourceforge.net/projects/swsusp/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/