Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752306AbdLLQNO (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:13:14 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:46166 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751609AbdLLQNM (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:13:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] ACPI/PPTT: Add topology parsing code To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com, Jonathan.Zhang@cavium.com, ahs3@redhat.com, Jayachandran.Nair@cavium.com, austinwc@codeaurora.org, lenb@kernel.org References: <20171201222330.18863-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <20171201222330.18863-7-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <9009154.M66RGdQJXA@aspire.rjw.lan> From: Jeremy Linton Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:13:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9009154.M66RGdQJXA@aspire.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 801 Lines: 25 Hi, First, thanks for taking a look at this. On 12/11/2017 07:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, December 1, 2017 11:23:27 PM CET Jeremy Linton wrote: >> The PPTT can be used to determine the groupings of CPU's at >> given levels in the system. Lets add a few routines to the PPTT >> parsing code to return a unique id for each unique level in the >> processor hierarchy. This can then be matched to build >> thread/core/cluster/die/package/etc mappings for each processing >> element in the system. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton > > Why can't this be folded into patch [2/9]? It can, and I will be happy squash it. It was requested that the topology portion of the parser be split out back in v3. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg78487.html