Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269133AbTGORQP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:16:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269144AbTGORQP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:16:15 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:15815 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269133AbTGORQN (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:16:13 -0400 Subject: Re: -ac kernels From: Alan Cox To: Ro0tSiEgE LKML Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <005b01c34aeb$e1c54e00$0500000a@bp> References: <005b01c34aeb$e1c54e00$0500000a@bp> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1058290104.3845.49.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 15 Jul 2003 18:28:30 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 858 Lines: 16 On Maw, 2003-07-15 at 17:12, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote: > What patches in the -ac kernels get put into the mainstream kernel? For > instance, I would assume that fixes in 2.6.0-test1-ac1 would make it into > 2.6.0-test2, but I'm not sure how that works, surely no one is just dropping > those fixes and not applying them at some point to the mainline kernels. So > I guess my question is, at what point does Linus' tree sync with Alan's? I'm trying to hoover up patches that make things work so it can get more people testing more and more driver stuff so that when Linus is back I can nuke his mailbox from orbit... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/