Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753911AbdLMCR2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:17:28 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:34973 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753800AbdLMCRY (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:17:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2] arm64: fault: avoid send SIGBUS two times To: James Morse CC: , , , References: <20171211160536.11600-1-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <5A301D4C.6070906@arm.com> From: gengdongjiu Message-ID: <5f6f49df-a868-dff2-3be3-ed747ac9f2b3@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:17:07 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A301D4C.6070906@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.142.68.147] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 385 Lines: 10 > Reviewed-by: James Morse > > > Nit: Your 'RESEND V2' and 'V2' are not the same patch. > 'RESEND' is to indicate you're reposting exactly the same patch, usually with a > fixed CC list. Anyone who receives both can ignore one as you've said they are > the same. James, Thanks for the reminder and guild, I will send a version V3 to eliminate this confusion