Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751060AbdLMHe0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:34:26 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:42603 "EHLO mail-io0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750748AbdLMHeX (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:34:23 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovsLZwL6LZzp+AOOFXCIm0xajXI7AmkvxNbo/KdiNpGIwDuTjfSFjUthnE/qBHFRb0RpuyepHgYqVsSF7kX/Hg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171211233625.5689-1-lukma@denx.de> References: <20171116232239.16823-1-lukma@denx.de> <20171211233625.5689-1-lukma@denx.de> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:34:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ARM: ep93xx: ts72xx: Add support for BK3 board To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Alexander Sverdlin , Arnd Bergmann , Arnd Bergmann , Hartley Sweeten , Russell King , Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Olof Johansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 937 Lines: 28 On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This patch series adds support for Liebherr's BK3 board, being > a derivative of TS72XX design. All looks good. Acked-by: Linus Walleij Out of curiosity: Liebherr is obviously doing heavy-duty industrial control systems. Likewise Hartley is doing similar business over at Vision Engravings. Is the situation such that there is a whole bunch of industrial systems out there, in active use and needing future upgrades, that use the EP93xx? Arnd has been nudging me to do DT conversion for EP93xx so if there are many active industrial users of these I should prioritize it, because these things have 20+ years support cycles. We also need to think about upholding support in GCC for ARMv4(t) for the foreseeable future if there is a big web of random deeply embedded systems out there that will need updates. Yours, Linus Walleij