Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753136AbdLMPFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:05:02 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34050 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752358AbdLMPE6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:04:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Simplify capability helper To: Peter Xu , Alex Williamson References: <20171212195850.13691.40496.stgit@gimli.home> <20171213064936.GC7780@xz-mi> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, kwankhede@nvidia.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <0bb4e51a-6fd2-e946-8927-b8d9fe491b07@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:04:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171213064936.GC7780@xz-mi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 36 Hi Peter, On 13/12/17 07:49, Peter Xu wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:59:39PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: >> The vfio_info_add_capability() helper requires the caller to pass a >> capability ID, which it then uses to fill in header fields, assuming >> hard coded versions. This makes for an awkward and rigid interface. >> The only thing we want this helper to do is allocate sufficient >> space in the caps buffer and chain this capability into the list. >> Reduce it to that simple task. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson > > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu > > Though during review I had a question related to the function > msix_sparse_mmap_cap(): Is it possible that one PCI device BAR is very > small (e.g., 4K) that only contains the MSI-X table (and another small > PBA area)? If so, should we just mark that region unmappable instead > of setting vfio_region_info_cap_sparse_mmap.nr_areas to 1 in > msix_sparse_mmap_cap()? > > /* If MSI-X table is aligned to the start or end, only one area */ > if (((vdev->msix_offset & PAGE_MASK) == 0) || > (PAGE_ALIGN(vdev->msix_offset + vdev->msix_size) >= end)) > nr_areas = 1; > > Thanks, > if I understand the code correctly, if the MSI-X table exactly matches the BAR, a sparse mmap region is reported with offset/size = 0. Is that correct? Thanks Eric