Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753438AbdLMPjv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:39:51 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0088.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.88]:41613 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753197AbdLMPjg (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:39:36 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 50,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:967:973:982:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2560:2563:2682:2685:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3622:3865:3866:3867:3870:3871:3872:3873:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4321:4605:5007:6117:6119:6691:9025:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11658:11914:12043:12438:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:13845:14181:14659:14721:21080:21433:21627:30054:30075:30080:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: chain46_537af8182b859 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2176 Message-ID: <1513179572.27409.8.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-rbtn: Block comments use * on subsequent lines From: Joe Perches To: Dhaval Shah , Philippe Ombredanne Cc: "pali.rohar@gmail.com" , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" , LKML Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 07:39:32 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20171213082301.23209-1-dhaval.shah@softnautics.com> , ,<1513167907.27409.3.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 632 Lines: 17 On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 12:41 +0000, Dhaval Shah wrote: > > If anyone does conversions of these license texts > > you have to be _extremely_ careful about what > > specific license identifier you use. > > This license includes the text > > "or (at your option) any later version" > > which is not the same as using > > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > I have given this SPDX ID based on the current license info in the driver. No, you have not. You have done it incorrectly. For a short description, read: https://spdx.org/sites/cpstandard/files/pages/files/using_spdx_license_list_short_identifiers.pdf page 5