Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753956AbdLMVcR (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:32:17 -0500 Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:47560 "EHLO galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753744AbdLMVcO (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:32:14 -0500 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Dan Murphy Cc: Jacek Anaszewski , robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, pavel@ucw.cz, sakari.ailus@iki.fi, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: as3645a: Fix checkpatch warnings Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:32:18 +0200 Message-ID: <11486565.PIGBh3m9bD@avalon> Organization: Ideas on Board Oy In-Reply-To: <799ae164-701a-87ce-fadf-8278f01c10d6@ti.com> References: <20171212215011.30066-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <98df06ef-9ee4-02b1-6d6b-f10b911a8d71@gmail.com> <799ae164-701a-87ce-fadf-8278f01c10d6@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1445 Lines: 42 Hi Dan, On Wednesday, 13 December 2017 22:49:38 EET Dan Murphy wrote: > On 12/13/2017 02:43 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > > On 12/13/2017 09:41 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > >> On 12/13/2017 02:29 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > >>> Hi Dan, > >>> > >>> checkpatch.pl doesn't want to be mentioned in the patch subject :-) > >> > >> Ack > >> > >>> "WARNING: A patch subject line should describe the change not the tool > >>> that found it" > >>> > >>> Preferably I'd see two separate patches. > >> > >> So you want me to split them up? I have no issue with that. > > > > Yeah, it will be easier to come up with concise but meaningful > > subjects. Well, given that one change splits a line that is too long and the other one merges two lines that fit within the limit we could come up with a message that covers both :-) This is nitpicking though, it doesn't matter much. I have no issue with a patch that has some "while at it" portion anyway as long as it's minor (I personally include white space fixes in patches that touch the related code for instance). > When I split these up can I add your Acked-by to each patch or would you > prefer to resend your Acked-by for each patch? Assuming you make no mistake, you can keep my ack :-) It will of course not cover the commit message then. > >>> Also, line length limit for the commit description is 75 characters. > >>> Please use whole available space. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart