From: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
To: mfasheh@versity.com, jlbec@evilplan.org
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ocfs2: add trimfs lock to avoid duplicated trims in cluster
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:14:44 +0800
Message-Id: <1513228484-2084-2-git-send-email-ghe@suse.com>
In-Reply-To: <1513228484-2084-1-git-send-email-ghe@suse.com>
References: <1513228484-2084-1-git-send-email-ghe@suse.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3330
Lines: 94

As you know, ocfs2 has support trim the underlying disk via
fstrim command. But there is a problem, ocfs2 is a shared disk
cluster file system, if the user configures a scheduled fstrim
job on each file system node, this will trigger multiple nodes
trim a shared disk simultaneously, it is very wasteful for CPU
and IO consumption, also might negatively affect the lifetime
of poor-quality SSD devices.
Then, we introduce a trimfs dlm lock to communicate with each
other in this case, which will make only one fstrim command to
do the trimming on a shared disk among the cluster, the fstrim
commands from the other nodes should wait for the first fstrim
to finish and returned success directly, to avoid running a the
same trim on the shared disk again.

Compare with first version, I change the fstrim commands' returned
value and behavior in case which meets a fstrim command is running
on a shared disk.

Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index ab5105f..5c9c3e2 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -7382,6 +7382,7 @@ int ocfs2_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
 	struct buffer_head *gd_bh = NULL;
 	struct ocfs2_dinode *main_bm;
 	struct ocfs2_group_desc *gd = NULL;
+	struct ocfs2_trim_fs_info info, *pinfo = NULL;
 
 	start = range->start >> osb->s_clustersize_bits;
 	len = range->len >> osb->s_clustersize_bits;
@@ -7419,6 +7420,42 @@ int ocfs2_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
 
 	trace_ocfs2_trim_fs(start, len, minlen);
 
+	ocfs2_trim_fs_lock_res_init(osb);
+	ret = ocfs2_trim_fs_lock(osb, NULL, 1);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
+			mlog_errno(ret);
+			ocfs2_trim_fs_lock_res_uninit(osb);
+			goto out_unlock;
+		}
+
+		mlog(ML_NOTICE, "Wait for trim on device (%s) to "
+		     "finish, which is running from another node.\n",
+		     osb->dev_str);
+		ret = ocfs2_trim_fs_lock(osb, &info, 0);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			mlog_errno(ret);
+			ocfs2_trim_fs_lock_res_uninit(osb);
+			goto out_unlock;
+		}
+
+		if (info.tf_valid && info.tf_success &&
+		    info.tf_start == start && info.tf_len == len &&
+		    info.tf_minlen == minlen) {
+			/* Avoid sending duplicated trim to a shared device */
+			mlog(ML_NOTICE, "The same trim on device (%s) was "
+			     "just done from node (%u), return.\n",
+			     osb->dev_str, info.tf_nodenum);
+			range->len = info.tf_trimlen;
+			goto out_trimunlock;
+		}
+	}
+
+	info.tf_nodenum = osb->node_num;
+	info.tf_start = start;
+	info.tf_len = len;
+	info.tf_minlen = minlen;
+
 	/* Determine first and last group to examine based on start and len */
 	first_group = ocfs2_which_cluster_group(main_bm_inode, start);
 	if (first_group == osb->first_cluster_group_blkno)
@@ -7463,6 +7500,13 @@ int ocfs2_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
 			group += ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(sb, osb->bitmap_cpg);
 	}
 	range->len = trimmed * sb->s_blocksize;
+
+	info.tf_trimlen = range->len;
+	info.tf_success = (ret ? 0 : 1);
+	pinfo = &info;
+out_trimunlock:
+	ocfs2_trim_fs_unlock(osb, pinfo);
+	ocfs2_trim_fs_lock_res_uninit(osb);
 out_unlock:
 	ocfs2_inode_unlock(main_bm_inode, 0);
 	brelse(main_bm_bh);
-- 
1.8.5.6