Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752066AbdLNMWh (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:22:37 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:40774 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719AbdLNMWg (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 07:22:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:22:29 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Gustavo Pimentel Cc: Joao Pinto , Niklas Cassel , Jingoo Han , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kishon@ti.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] PCI: dwc: Use the DMA-API to get the MSI address Message-ID: <20171214122229.GB27348@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20171120133222.27771-1-niklas.cassel@axis.com> <20171120133222.27771-2-niklas.cassel@axis.com> <20171130152843.GC12096@red-moon> <20171213135953.GA30833@axis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2471 Lines: 63 On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:16:38PM +0000, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > Hi Niklas and Lorenzo, > > I'm going to work on PCI software development now as told by Joao and I will > test your code now. > > I was retrieving the patches through the patchwork > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?submitter=65580 and I > notice that its missing the patch 13 and 17, is this right? No, you just have to refine the filter, I marked the DT bindings as ready to be applied that's why they do not show up (and by the way you can test the series even without those two patches - that are just DT bindings). Thanks, Lorenzo > If not, can you give me both patches location? > > Thanks. > > > On 13/12/2017 17:21, Joao Pinto wrote: > > Hi Niklas, > > > > ??s 1:59 PM de 12/13/2017, Niklas Cassel escreveu: > >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:28:43PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >>> Jingoo, Joao, > >>> > >>> I am expecting your testing on the series and ACKs on the dwc related > >>> patches please, according to v4 review - I will mark them as needs > >>> review/ACK waiting for you to chime in. > >>> > >>> v4 thread: > >>> > >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_patch_833882_&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=CQAV8rCgm2jd7m3iSWL5vBbGTqSc7yN3N7zeQDz-ZUY&s=mqyDi45qm4qE0jcm0KviYAoLHmMXMMIWEW-gAR0RKOw&e= > >>> > >> Hello Lorenzo, Jingoo, Joao, > >> > >> Tomorrow another 2 weeks has passed. > >> V1 of this patch series was posted on 2017-10-13. > > Sorry, I have been tight up with a debug session and not able to check this out. > > Adding Gustavo in CC that is now also working in PCI software development. > > I am going to check the code ASAP and we will test it as soon as the debug is > > finished. > > > > Thanks. > > > >> I'm a bit worried that this patch series will not make it to linux-next > >> in time for this patch series to be included in the 4.16 pull request. > >> > >> Here is the V5 patch series: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_linux-2Dpci_list_-3Fseries-3D14364&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=CQAV8rCgm2jd7m3iSWL5vBbGTqSc7yN3N7zeQDz-ZUY&s=qXtUHFXK7_nCndQob0I0qDByBdJsL7rRjZ9cx7c847U&e= > >> > >> Perhaps any maintainer of a designware based PCIe driver could > >> help out and test this patch series? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Niklas > >> > >