Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753481AbdLNRMl (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:12:41 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:38013 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753258AbdLNRMk (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:12:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:12:35 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: syzbot cc: bp@suse.de, dsafonov@virtuozzo.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, me@kylehuey.com, mingo@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request in __switch_to In-Reply-To: <001a1145e8548cbd3d055f73374f@google.com> Message-ID: References: <001a1145e8548cbd3d055f73374f@google.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1761 Lines: 39 On Sun, 3 Dec 2017, syzbot wrote: > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffff8 > IP: switch_fpu_prepare arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:535 [inline] > IP: __switch_to+0x95b/0x1330 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:407 > PGD 5e28067 P4D 5e28067 PUD 5e2a067 PMD 0 > Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP KASAN > Dumping ftrace buffer: > (ftrace buffer empty) > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 PID: 4355 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1-next-20171129+ #55 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google > 01/01/2011 > task: ffff8801cf1e80c0 task.stack: ffff8801d03a8000 > RIP: 0010:switch_fpu_prepare arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:535 [inline] > RIP: 0010:__switch_to+0x95b/0x1330 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:407 > RSP: 0018:ffff8801cb867468 EFLAGS: 00010046 > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801cc0b8500 RCX: ffff8801cc0b9a00 > RDX: 1ffff10039e3d2d0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8801cf1e96c0 > RBP: ffff8801cb867628 R08: ffff8801db427918 R09: 1ffff1003a075dfe > R10: ffff8801cf1e80c0 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff8801cf1e80c0 > R13: ffff8801cf1e96c0 R14: ffff8801cf1e9680 R15: ffff8801cf1e95c0 > FS: 00007f16e6ea0700(0000) GS:ffff8801db400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: fffffffffffffff8 CR3: 00000001cc778000 CR4: 00000000001426f0 > Call Trace: > Code: b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 0f b6 04 02 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f > 8e d5 06 00 00 8b 85 70 fe ff ff 41 89 84 24 c0 15 00 00 1f 44 00 00 65 is an int3 !?!?! > 8b 05 99 01 dc 7e 89 c0 48 0f a3 05 df 97 39 That's the second report I'm staring at today which has CR2 fffffffffffffffx and points to a faulting instruction which does not make any sense at all. Thanks, tglx