Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752914AbdLNUr7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:47:59 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:36091 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752064AbdLNUr5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:47:57 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouXMW8kYMuTgraNkw9iH/0R7BtoaodLqCNXfl39fafdBtecg0X42OWonqqjW9lsQ+v2B7+c14/+t7Jzqwm42Nw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171214203815.GA29972@amd> References: <2809506.pL8kVbvXcY@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171210213804.GA4660@amd> <76028A95-1CE1-49AA-9929-9C15FFC520EB@amacapital.net> <151331264.Sjvx2oHGGq@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171214203815.GA29972@amd> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:47:56 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: askn-t4hT1LBUuw6qITF3BlLdbk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Lutomirski , Zhang Rui , Thomas Gleixner , Jarkko Nikula , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 25 On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > But given this is already "regression fix for x86-64 caused regression > on x86-32", I really believe we should merge trivial fix now, and do > the cleanups / nicer fixes sometime later? The fix patch was already posted, but in another thread (confusingly with _almost_ the same subject: "Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in resume from ACPI S3"). Here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/fixes but it hasn't actually gotten to me yet (I think Luto made a new version where he split it up into three smaller patches, and I'm assuming it's in one of the -tip trees heading for me asap). All the x86 people have been insanely busy with the crazy page table isolation patches, that probably is slowing down things. But I was expecting to get the -tip tree pulls tomorrow (.. because.. Friday. It's my busiest day of the week because everybody wants to get their work out before the weekend). Linus