Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270862AbTGPKNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:13:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270863AbTGPKNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:13:33 -0400 Received: from mauve.demon.co.uk ([158.152.209.66]:12942 "EHLO mauve.demon.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270862AbTGPKNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:13:33 -0400 From: root@mauve.demon.co.uk Message-Id: <200307161025.LAA01549@mauve.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: How to test the new kernel 2.6.0-test1 ? To: stephane.wirtel@belgacom.net (Stephane Wirtel) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:25:18 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030716082731.GA6202@stargate.brutele.be> from "Stephane Wirtel" at Jul 16, 2003 10:27:31 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 936 Lines: 22 > I am using the kernel 2.6.0-test1 on my computer, and it works perfectly. > > Which are the weaknesses of the new kernel, an idea ? It almost certainly has bugs. Most of the ones present probably don't show up much on an average machine, with an average load. Try the edge cases, such as plugging in twenty thousand USB mice, running it on a 386/20 with 4Mb ram, unplugging USB devices when in use, ... The rarer bugs that do present on an average machine, with average loading just need more people to test, and report oopses or other errors related to the kernel. Just running it helps, if only because it lowers the probability of such bugs being present before 2.6.0 is released. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/