Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:49:42 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        rpurdie@rpsys.net, sakari.ailus@iki.fi,
        laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: as3645a: Fix checkpatch warnings
Message-ID: <20171214224941.GA10957@amd>
References: <20171212215011.30066-1-dmurphy@ti.com>
 <ac821766-4bb8-d5d4-feaf-6750e8ceb894@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ac821766-4bb8-d5d4-feaf-6750e8ceb894@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 947
Lines: 36


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed 2017-12-13 21:29:29, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>=20
> checkpatch.pl doesn't want to be mentioned in the patch subject :-)
>=20
> "WARNING: A patch subject line should describe the change not the tool
> that found it"

That is pretty stupid rule. Everyone and their dog knows what
"checkpatch fixes" are.
								=09
									Pavel
--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlozAAUACgkQMOfwapXb+vKKnQCeNelodL3+iQ9BYbq4Jg3OKyDF
hZ8An1ZiY1z5AgwadfZ0maenr/taAJ/s
=0oLg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--