Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755130AbdLOLbd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:31:33 -0500
Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:40522 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754389AbdLOLbb (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:31:31 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotDcJgwt+GZt3dqtThlzFpBubW2+1H72TdEKkrkauOxg0wWt9r+lu7nA2wmeTNAmcOIJCoz+g==
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:31:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH urgent 0/3] __restore_processor_state() fixes
Message-ID: <20171215113127.uga2keiidjgs7quk@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1513286253.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <2218120.DOUuxV87Xe@aspire.rjw.lan>
 <001475f3-ad4c-4d89-dec2-362f7e28da33@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001475f3-ad4c-4d89-dec2-362f7e28da33@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 941
Lines: 28


* Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 12/15/2017 03:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:19:04 PM CET Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > __restore_processor_state() was spaghetti code, made no sense, and
> > > had bugs.  And I broke resume on 32-bit systems.  This series cleans
> > > it up and fixes it (hopefully!).
> > > 
> > > Andy Lutomirski (3):
> > >    x86/power/64: Use struct desc_ptr for the IDT in struct saved_context
> > >    x86/power/32: Move SYSENTER MSR restoration to fix_processor_context()
> > >    x86/power: Make restore_processor_context() sane
> > 
> > For all three:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > 
>
> Works still after split up so my tested by remains. Please note Pavel gave
> his reported/tested-by in 3/3.

Thanks, I've updated all the changelogs - and I've also added your Reported-by tag 
to patch #3.

Thanks,

	Ingo