Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755304AbdLOLcx (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:32:53 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:54538 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755048AbdLOLcv (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:32:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:32:42 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Rob Herring , Daniel Lezcano , Nicolas Ferre , Thomas Gleixner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: chosen: Add clocksource and clockevent selection Message-ID: <20171215113242.skmh5nzr7wqdmvnw@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20171213185313.20017-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20171213185313.20017-2-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171213185313.20017-2-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3073 Lines: 83 Hi, On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 07:53:11PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > The clocksource and clockevent timer are probed early in the boot process. > At that time it is difficult for linux to know whether a particular timer > can be used as the clocksource or the clockevent or by another driver, > especially when they are all identical or have similar features. I think that to solve this problem, we need to stop treating clocksources and clockevent devices as completely separate device types, and instead treat them as particular cases of a more general clock device. That way, a driver can register a single device, with flags saying whether it is: * a clocksource only * a clockevent device only * both a clocksource and clockevent device * both, but mutually exclusive at runtime ... and thus drivers don't have to make an impossible decision up-front as to how the device should be used. As more devices get registered, the core timekeeping code can improve on its choices and re-assign devices. That doesn't solve the case where a clock device may use resources we want for something else, but I think we can solve that separately. Thanks, Mark. > Until now, multiple strategies have been used to solve that: > - use Kconfig option as MXC_USE_EPIT or ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC_BLOCK > - use a kernel parameter as the "clocksource" early_param in mach-omap2 > - registering the first seen timer as a clockevent and the second one as > a clocksource as in rk_timer_init or dw_apb_timer_init > > Add a linux,clocksource and a linux,clockevent node in chosen with a timer > property pointing to the timer to use. Other properties, like the targeted > precision may be added later. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt > index e3b13ea7d2ae..c7ee3ecb5276 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt > @@ -120,3 +120,23 @@ e.g. > While this property does not represent a real hardware, the address > and the size are expressed in #address-cells and #size-cells, > respectively, of the root node. > + > +linux,clocksource and linux,clockevent > +-------------------------------------- > + > +Those nodes have a timer property. This property is a phandle to the timer to be > +chosen as the clocksource or clockevent. This is only useful when the platform > +has multiple identical timers and it is not possible to let linux make the > +correct choice. > + > +/ { > + chosen { > + linux,clocksource { > + timer = <&timer0>; > + }; > + > + linux,clockevent { > + timer = <&timer1>; > + }; > + }; > +}; > -- > 2.15.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html