Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756036AbdLORZE (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:25:04 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:39267 "EHLO mail-qk0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755722AbdLORZA (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:25:00 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovrMqU2G2720G9f81AjxJg070PPXFZTb7khxs6ml4kZ25oWVka91j86GtLzvfjm6btcJdWFUoISkESPOVgDbx4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20171209155252.6403-1-vincent.legoll@gmail.com> <20171215151910.GC3204@codeblueprint.co.uk> From: Vincent Legoll Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:24:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: make EFI a menuconfig to ease disabling it all To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Matt Fleming , Kees Cook , Anton Vorontsov , Colin Cross , Tony Luck , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 191 Lines: 12 Hello, >> This looks fine to me. Ard? > > Doesn't this break existing configs? Would adding a "default yes" on the new menuconfig be OK. If yes, I'd respin it for a v2 -- Vincent Legoll