Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270942AbTGPQjs (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:39:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270949AbTGPQjs (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:39:48 -0400 Received: from bristol.phunnypharm.org ([65.207.35.130]:39879 "EHLO bristol.phunnypharm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270942AbTGPQjr (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:39:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:53:40 -0400 From: Ben Collins To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Philippe Gramoull? , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux IEEE 1394 Devel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1: bad: scheduling while atomic! after removing ohci1394 module Message-ID: <20030716165339.GP685@phunnypharm.org> References: <20030716180855.22d4a4f4.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <20030716163648.GO685@phunnypharm.org> <20030716164506.GD5628@gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030716164506.GD5628@gtf.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 824 Lines: 20 On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:45:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:36:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > So is kill_proc() bad while atomic, e.g. when a module is being removed? > > I'll look into it. > > hmmm, that's a big strange. During ->remove and module unload, you can > schedule and sleep. I'd have to check to make sure the remove callbacks are doing something stupid in the ieee1394 subsystem, like causing this problem. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/