Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1756997AbdLPRei (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:34:38 -0500
Received: from mail-pl0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42026 "EHLO
        mail-pl0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1756796AbdLPRef (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:34:35 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosc2PAM8xJrLNLfdeqLTU5DzAm1zDFjmLZCqi6uba+x0s95Y8pw18TBBnwQXntdutZLfveGRQ==
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 09:34:28 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        fabio.estevam@nxp.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, caleb@crome.org,
        lgirdwood@gmail.com, arnaud.mouiche@invoxia.com, lukma@denx.de,
        kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Refine all comments
Message-ID: <20171216173427.GA3840@Asurada>
References: <1513207108-30430-1-git-send-email-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
 <1513207108-30430-4-git-send-email-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
 <aad404d3-fa61-3c49-6265-04fc3b256bc6@tabi.org>
 <CAGoOwPSqf4oKB=gZdD8=W=q9y=CcpjYyUuWkmfm7dQc+P6QDmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGoOwPR3BQY9VNyi5qgQH-tdY3WPNyRhfiC26hLQabQQejGBRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3ee01787-9c38-6780-b247-b7d81769e53e@tabi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3ee01787-9c38-6780-b247-b7d81769e53e@tabi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 698
Lines: 24

Hi,

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:27:06AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 12/16/17 12:10 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am outside so can't use mutt. Sorry for that.
> >
> >This comment is going to be replaced in the 2nd set anyway because the
> >whole function will be replaced.
> 
> So you're asking me to review comment changes that will soon be deleted?

I never said "deleted".

> Can you send out a new patch without changes to comments, so that I can
> focus on the ones that matter?

Please don't make any assumption. I am trying my best to do that.
And that's the reason why I have this patch here. I have already
done as much as I can to integrate all comments here.

Thanks
Nicolin