Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757909AbdLRD2K (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:28:10 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:34961 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757810AbdLRD2I (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:28:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Detecting RWF_NOWAIT support To: Avi Kivity , linux-kernel , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org References: <4ae3426d-8104-c243-72e4-671e89401b23@suse.de> <0ae3b9d3-0e57-5562-5a8d-62496a261521@scylladb.com> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:28:03 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0ae3b9d3-0e57-5562-5a8d-62496a261521@scylladb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1673 Lines: 49 On 12/16/2017 08:49 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 12/14/2017 09:15 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: >> >> On 12/14/2017 11:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> I'm looking to add support for RWF_NOWAIT within a linux-aio iocb. >>> Naturally, I need to detect at runtime whether the kernel support >>> RWF_NOWAIT or not. >>> >>> >>> The only method I could find was to issue an I/O with RWF_NOWAIT set, >>> and look for errors. This is somewhat less than perfect: >>> >>>   - from the error, I can't tell whether RWF_NOWAIT was the problem, or >>> something else. If I enable a number of new features, I have to run >>> through all combinations to figure out which ones are supported and >>> which are not. >> Here is the return codes for RWF_NOWAIT >> EINVAL - not supported (older kernel) >> EOPNOTSUPP - not supported >> EAGAIN - supported but could not complete because I/O will be delayed > > Which of these are returned from io_submit() and which are returned in > the iocb? These are returned in iocb. > >> 0 - supported and I/O completed (success). >> >>>   - RWF_NOWAIT support is per-filesystem, so I can't just remember >>> not to >>> enable RWF_NOWAIT globally, I have to track it per file. >> Yes, the support is per filesystem. So, the application must know if the >> filesystem supports it, possibly by performing a small I/O. > > So the application must know about filesystem mount points, and be > prepared to create a file and try to write it (in case the filesystem is > empty) or alter its behavior during runtime depending on the errors it > sees. Well yes. Hopefully, the application knows what it is doing when it performs RWF_NOWAIT. -- Goldwyn