Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933202AbdLRJHr (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:07:47 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51428 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932714AbdLRJHo (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 04:07:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:07:47 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Chunyan Zhang Cc: Viresh Kumar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Wang , Orson Zhai , Chunyan Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: list_del_rcu should be used in function _remove_list_dev Message-ID: <20171218090747.GB10436@kroah.com> References: <20171218083223.26647-1-chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171218083223.26647-1-chunyan.zhang@spreadtrum.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2604 Lines: 51 On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:32:23PM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote: > From: Vincent Wang > > list_del_rcu() should be used to replace list_del() in the function > _remove_list_dev(), since the opp is a rcu protected pointer. > > For example, on an ARM big.Little platform of spreadtrum, there are > little cluster, big cluster and gpu using pm_opp. And the opp_table > of big cluster will be removed when big cluster is removed, which > is implemented in the cpufreq driver. Sometimes an issue maybe occur: > > [ 237.647758] c0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address dead000000000110 > [ 237.647776] c0 pgd = ffffffc073e78000 > [ 237.647786] c0 [dead000000000110] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000 > [ 237.647808] c0 Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > [ 237.653535] c0 Modules linked in: sprdwl_ng(O) mtty marlin2_fm mali_kbase(O) > [ 237.653569] c0 CPU: 0 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/u12:1 Tainted: G S W O 4.4.83+ #1 > [ 237.653578] c0 Hardware name: Spreadtrum SP9850KHsmt 1h10 Board (DT) > [ 237.653594] c0 Workqueue: devfreq_wq devfreq_monitor > [ 237.653605] c0 task: ffffffc0babd0d80 task.stack: ffffffc0badbc000 > [ 237.653619] c0 PC is at _find_device_opp+0x58/0xac > [ 237.653629] c0 LR is at dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil+0x2c/0xb8 > > [ 237.921294] c0 Call trace: > [ 237.921425] c0 [] _find_device_opp+0x58/0xac > [ 237.921437] c0 [] dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil+0x2c/0xb8 > [ 237.921452] c0 [] devfreq_recommended_opp+0x54/0x7c > [ 237.921494] c0 [] kbase_wait_write_flush+0x164/0x358 [mali_kbase] > [ 237.921504] c0 [] update_devfreq+0x8c/0xf8 > [ 237.921514] c0 [] devfreq_monitor+0x34/0x94 > [ 237.921529] c0 [] process_one_work+0x154/0x458 > [ 237.921539] c0 [] worker_thread+0x134/0x4a4 > [ 237.921551] c0 [] kthread+0xdc/0xf0 > [ 237.921564] c0 [] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30 > > Cc: stable # 4.4 > Signed-off-by: Vincent Wang > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang > --- > > This patch is only for 4.4 stable branch. > Once this patch accepted, I can cook a similar patch for 4.9 stable branch. This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.