Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758226AbdLRKRt (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:17:49 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-f67.google.com ([209.85.213.67]:36297 "EHLO mail-vk0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752200AbdLRKRq (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:17:46 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotc9hZNzWbwoAAACLwmXZ2ythh4AkYa8RwB45efj2Z8oGH7XMUSbjH122+EX4di1bs70mCuiBs8mbKkU3A804E= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20171215124630.30082-1-malat@debian.org> From: Mathieu Malaterre Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:17:24 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bVEYnxjFHxjP5RNcXJJvUxCvTMU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/25] arm: exynos/s3c: dts: Remove leading 0x and 0s from bindings notation To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Kukjin Kim , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3591 Lines: 84 On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Improve the DTS files by removing all the leading "0x" and zeros to fix the >> following dtc warnings: >> >> Warning (unit_address_format): Node /XXX unit name should not have leading "0x" >> >> and >> >> Warning (unit_address_format): Node /XXX unit name should not have leading 0s >> >> Converted using the following command: >> >> find . -type f \( -iname *.dts -o -iname *.dtsi \) -exec sed -i -e "s/@\([0-9a-fA-FxX\.;:#]+\)\s*{/@\L\1 {/g" -e "s/@0x\(.*\) {/@\1 {/g" -e "s/@0+\(.*\) {/@\1 {/g" {} +^C >> >> For simplicity, two sed expressions were used to solve each warnings separately. >> >> To make the regex expression more robust a few other issues were resolved, >> namely setting unit-address to lower case, and adding a whitespace before the >> the opening curly brace: >> >> https://elinux.org/Device_Tree_Linux#Linux_conventions >> >> This will solve as a side effect warning: >> >> Warning (simple_bus_reg): Node /XXX@ simple-bus unit address format error, expected "" >> >> This is a follow up to commit 4c9847b7375a ("dt-bindings: Remove leading 0x from bindings notation") >> >> Reported-by: David Daney >> Suggested-by: Rob Herring >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Ack was for different patchset, touching only three files... So sorry, when I read your email: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/15/152 I assumed you meant for all the Exynos* and S3C* DTS files, but I did not check carefully which files were touched originally. >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 34 ++++++------ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 56 +++++++++---------- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 8 +-- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-pinctrl.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 22 ++++---- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 22 ++++---- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 64 +++++++++++----------- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5260.dtsi | 26 ++++----- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 78 +++++++++++++-------------- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi | 2 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 14 ++--- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/s3c2416.dtsi | 8 +-- >> 12 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 168 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi >> index 2bd3872221a1..8d47571b3984 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi >> @@ -164,31 +164,31 @@ >> syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>; >> }; >> >> - pd_cam: cam-power-domain@10023C00 { >> + pd_cam: cam-power-domain@10023c00 { > > This is not related to this patch and it was not present in the > version I acked. I also already fixed this here: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10113323/ > > There is no changelog explaining the difference in patches. Original > patch was okay, why changing it? Accept my sincere apologizes I really messed this series. I discover my original ARM patch did not apply lower case to all unit-address equally, so I added at last minute a sed expression to make all unit-address lower case. I guess you can just drop this one for now. -M