Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932958AbdLRK1B (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:27:01 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:52325 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757677AbdLRK07 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:26:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:26:57 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: David Miller Cc: nix.or.die@gmail.com, bpoirier@suse.com, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, aaron.f.brown@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped working Message-ID: <20171218102657.GB5338@amd> References: <20171210083949.GA3872@amd> <20171215092849.GB15090@amd> <20171215.105210.103516329605719086.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171215.105210.103516329605719086.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1754 Lines: 60 --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > >> >In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and > >> >manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either. > >> > > >> >Card is: > >> > > >> >02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet > >> >Controller > > .... > >> >Any ideas ? > >>=20 > >> Yes , 19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013 broke it. > >>=20 > >> See: > >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D198047 > >>=20 > >> Fix there : > >> https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D151272209903675&w=3D2 > >=20 > > I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet > > is... somehow annoying. What is going on there? >=20 > Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over > the past few years, I have to say. >=20 > Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the > maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case. >=20 > Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical > bug fixes propagated. No response AFAICT. I guess I should test reverting 19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013, then ask you for revert? Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlo3l/EACgkQMOfwapXb+vJw5QCgmUlP/gKxwWyYB14jFk4GDDKR I8AAnjS8ZfM900HU5gNrU1AOxl4Yup4M =OXA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--