Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751970AbdLSQhb (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:37:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39826 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbdLSQh2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:37:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:37:26 -0700 From: Alex Williamson To: Tomasz Nowicki Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com, Jayachandran.Nair@cavium.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@cavium.com, mw@semihalf.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] iommu: Make sure device's ID array elements are unique Message-ID: <20171219093726.432e16e7@t450s.home> In-Reply-To: <1513696821-32291-1-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com> References: <1513696436-31834-1-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com> <1513696821-32291-1-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2410 Lines: 75 On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:20:21 +0100 Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > While iterating over DMA aliases for a PCI device, for some rare cases > (i.e. PCIe-to-PCI/X bridges) we may get exactly the same ID as initial child > device. In turn, the same ID may get registered for a device multiple times. > Eventually IOMMU driver may try to configure the same ID within domain > multiple times too which for some IOMMU drivers is illegal and causes kernel > panic. > > Rule out ID duplication prior to device ID array registration. > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.14+ You've identified a release, is there a specific commit this fixes? > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki > --- > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > index 3de5c0b..9b2c138 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > @@ -1945,6 +1945,31 @@ void iommu_fwspec_free(struct device *dev) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_fwspec_free); > > +static void iommu_fwspec_remove_ids_dup(struct device *dev, u32 *ids, > + int *num_ids) > +{ > + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec; > + int i, j, k, valid_ids = *num_ids; > + > + for (i = 0; i < valid_ids; i++) { > + for (j = 0; j < fwspec->num_ids; j++) { > + if (ids[i] != fwspec->ids[j]) > + continue; > + > + dev_info(dev, "found 0x%x ID duplication, skipped\n", > + ids[i]); > + > + for (k = i + 1; k < valid_ids; k++) > + ids[k - 1] = ids[k]; Use memmove()? > + > + valid_ids--; > + break; At this point ids[i] is not the ids[i] that we tested for dupes, it's what was ids[i + 1], but we're going to i++ on the next iteration and we therefore never test that entry. > + } > + } > + > + *num_ids = valid_ids; > +} > + > int iommu_fwspec_add_ids(struct device *dev, u32 *ids, int num_ids) > { > struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec; > @@ -1954,6 +1979,9 @@ int iommu_fwspec_add_ids(struct device *dev, u32 *ids, int num_ids) > if (!fwspec) > return -EINVAL; > > + /* Rule out IDs already registered */ > + iommu_fwspec_remove_ids_dup(dev, ids, &num_ids); > + > size = offsetof(struct iommu_fwspec, ids[fwspec->num_ids + num_ids]); > if (size > sizeof(*fwspec)) { > fwspec = krealloc(dev->iommu_fwspec, size, GFP_KERNEL);