From: Michael Buesch <fsdeveloper@yahoo.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: devfsd
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:38:59 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <20030715214610.GA21238@core.citynetwireless.net> <20030717165603.A8369@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030717165603.A8369@infradead.org>
Cc: Ro0tSiEgE LKML <lkml@ro0tsiege.org>,
       linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Description: clearsigned data
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200307171839.10951.fsdeveloper@yahoo.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1115
Lines: 33

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 17 July 2003 17:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:46:10PM -0500, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote:
> > Why is devfsd still tagged as EXPERIMENTAL even in 2.6.0-test1 ? Is
> > there something wrong with it, or has it just not been changed?
>
> It's still there because we don't have a BROKEN tag.

Hm, should we introduce a BROKEN tag? (I'm not kidding. :) )
Because in a development tree, many things are known broken
and with this tag we may reduce the same bug-reports on
this list over and over again.

- -- 
Regards Michael Buesch
http://www.8ung.at/tuxsoft
Penguin on this machine:  Linux 2.4.21  - i386

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/FtEuoxoigfggmSgRAvvxAJ4oeM9wSBYh9zSMESK90bFR+JfLXgCfWiDU
BZdHfen1MsXcNv6OicXSr9w=
=wrz0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/