Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755420AbdLTO2N (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:28:13 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f67.google.com ([209.85.160.67]:38868 "EHLO mail-pl0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755215AbdLTO2J (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:28:09 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouXzB5EHg+OyOgIP+0dajzNtOJoTqwT2eLjXydmFOfADI1jm6Fy36DdF+HrjMzkYoENnGG7Zg== Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 22:27:58 +0800 From: Dong Aisheng To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Dong Aisheng , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, Anson.Huang@nxp.com, ping.bai@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/10] clk: clk-divider: add CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE clk support Message-ID: <20171220142757.GB30461@b29396-OptiPlex-7040> References: <1499946435-7177-1-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> <1499946435-7177-2-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> <20171102075039.GU30645@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171102075039.GU30645@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 13418 Lines: 438 On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:50:39AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/13, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > > index 9bb472c..55f8c41 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c > > @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ unsigned long divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate, > > struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); > > unsigned int div; > > > > + if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE && !val) > > + return 0; > > + > > div = _get_div(table, val, flags, divider->width); > > if (!div) { > > WARN(!(flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO), > > @@ -141,8 +144,13 @@ static unsigned long clk_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > > struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); > > unsigned int val; > > > > - val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift; > > - val &= div_mask(divider->width); > > + if ((divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE) && > > + !clk_hw_is_enabled(hw)) { > > This seems racy. Are we holding the register lock here? > Would you please clarify what type of racy you mean? Currently it only protects register write between set_rate and enable/disable, and other register read are not protected. e.g. in recalc_rate and is_enabled. And i did see similar users, e.g. drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mult.c Should we still need protect them here? > > + val = divider->cached_val; > > + } else { > > + val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift; > > + val &= div_mask(divider->width); > > + } > > > > return divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, val, divider->table, > > divider->flags); > > @@ -392,6 +400,12 @@ static int clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > > value = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, divider->table, > > divider->width, divider->flags); > > > > + if ((divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE) && > > + !clk_hw_is_enabled(hw)) { > > Same racy comment here. > > > + divider->cached_val = value; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > if (divider->lock) > > spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags); > > else > > @@ -414,10 +428,85 @@ static int clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static int clk_divider_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) > > +{ > > + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); > > + unsigned long flags = 0; > > + u32 val; > > + > > + if (!(divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE)) > > + return 0; > > This is not good. We will always jump to these functions on > enable/disable for a divider although 99.9% of all dividers that > exist won't need to run this code at all. > I absolutely understand this concern. > Can you please move this logic into your own divider > implementation? The flag can be added to the generic layer if > necessary but I'd prefer to see this logic kept in the driver > that uses it. If we get more than one driver doing the cached > divider thing then we can think about moving it to the more > generic place like here, but for now we should be able to keep > this contained away from the basic types and handled by the > quirky driver that needs it. > If only for above issue, how about invent a clk_divider_gate_ops to separate the users of normal divider and zero gate divider: diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c index 4ed516c..b51f3f9 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c @@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ unsigned long divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate, div = _get_div(table, val, flags, divider->width); if (!div) { + if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE) + return 0; + WARN(!(flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO), "%s: Zero divisor and CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO not set\n", clk_hw_get_name(hw)); @@ -148,6 +151,23 @@ static unsigned long clk_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, divider->flags); } +static unsigned long clk_divider_gate_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); + unsigned int val; + + if (!clk_hw_is_enabled(hw)) { + val = divider->cached_val; + } else { + val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift; + val &= div_mask(divider->width); + } + + return divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, val, divider->table, + divider->flags); +} + static bool _is_valid_table_div(const struct clk_div_table *table, unsigned int div) { @@ -416,6 +436,89 @@ static int clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, return 0; } +static int clk_divider_gate_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); + int value; + + if (!clk_hw_is_enabled(hw)) { + value = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, divider->table, + divider->width, divider->flags); + if (value < 0) + return value; + + divider->cached_val = value; + + return 0; + } + + return clk_divider_set_rate(hw, rate, parent_rate); +} + +static int clk_divider_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); + unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags); + u32 val; + + if (!divider->cached_val) { + pr_err("%s: no valid preset rate\n", clk_hw_get_name(hw)); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (divider->lock) + spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags); + else + __acquire(divider->lock); + + /* restore div val */ + val = clk_readl(divider->reg); + val |= divider->cached_val << divider->shift; + clk_writel(val, divider->reg); + + if (divider->lock) + spin_unlock_irqrestore(divider->lock, flags); + else + __release(divider->lock); + + return 0; +} + +static void clk_divider_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); + unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags); + u32 val; + + if (divider->lock) + spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags); + else + __acquire(divider->lock); + + /* store the current div val */ + val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift; + val &= div_mask(divider->width); + divider->cached_val = val; + clk_writel(0, divider->reg); + + if (divider->lock) + spin_unlock_irqrestore(divider->lock, flags); + else + __release(divider->lock); +} + +static int clk_divider_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw) +{ + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); + u32 val; + + val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift; + val &= div_mask(divider->width); + + return val ? 1 : 0; +} + const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ops = { .recalc_rate = clk_divider_recalc_rate, .round_rate = clk_divider_round_rate, @@ -423,6 +526,16 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ops = { }; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_divider_ops); +const struct clk_ops clk_divider_gate_ops = { + .recalc_rate = clk_divider_gate_recalc_rate, + .round_rate = clk_divider_round_rate, + .set_rate = clk_divider_gate_set_rate, + .enable = clk_divider_enable, + .disable = clk_divider_disable, + .is_enabled = clk_divider_is_enabled, +}; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_divider_gate_ops); + const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ro_ops = { .recalc_rate = clk_divider_recalc_rate, .round_rate = clk_divider_round_rate, @@ -438,6 +551,7 @@ static struct clk_hw *_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name, struct clk_divider *div; struct clk_hw *hw; struct clk_init_data init; + u32 val; int ret; if (clk_divider_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK) { @@ -455,6 +569,8 @@ static struct clk_hw *_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name, init.name = name; if (clk_divider_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY) init.ops = &clk_divider_ro_ops; + else if (clk_divider_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE) + init.ops = &clk_divider_gate_ops; else init.ops = &clk_divider_ops; init.flags = flags | CLK_IS_BASIC; @@ -470,6 +586,12 @@ static struct clk_hw *_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name, div->hw.init = &init; div->table = table; + if (div->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE) { + val = clk_readl(reg) >> shift; + val &= div_mask(width); + div->cached_val = val; + } + /* register the clock */ hw = &div->hw; ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw); diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h index 7c925e6..5f33b73 100644 --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ struct clk_div_table { * @shift: shift to the divider bit field * @width: width of the divider bit field * @table: array of value/divider pairs, last entry should have div = 0 + * @cached_val: cached div hw value used for CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE * @lock: register lock * * Clock with an adjustable divider affecting its output frequency. Implements @@ -386,6 +387,12 @@ struct clk_div_table { * CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO - For dividers which are like CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED * except when the value read from the register is zero, the divisor is * 2^width of the field. + * CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE - For dividers which are like CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED + * when the value read from the register is zero, it means the divisor + * is gated. For this case, the cached_val will be used to store the + * intermediate div for the normal rate operation, like set_rate/get_rate/ + * recalc_rate. When the divider is ungated, the driver will actually + * program the hardware to have the requested divider value. */ struct clk_divider { struct clk_hw hw; @@ -394,6 +401,7 @@ struct clk_divider { u8 width; u8 flags; const struct clk_div_table *table; + u32 cached_val; spinlock_t *lock; }; @@ -406,6 +414,7 @@ struct clk_divider { #define CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST BIT(4) #define CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY BIT(5) #define CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO BIT(6) +#define CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE BIT(7) extern const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ops; extern const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ro_ops; Anyway, if you still think it's not proper, i can put it in platform driver as you wish, just in the cost of a few duplicated codes. > > + > > + if (!divider->cached_val) { > > + pr_err("%s: no valid preset rate\n", clk_hw_get_name(hw)); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + if (divider->lock) > > + spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags); > > + else > > + __acquire(divider->lock); > > + > > + /* restore div val */ > > + val = clk_readl(divider->reg); > > + val |= divider->cached_val << divider->shift; > > + clk_writel(val, divider->reg); > > + > > + if (divider->lock) > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(divider->lock, flags); > > + else > > + __release(divider->lock); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void clk_divider_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) > > +{ > > + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); > > + unsigned long flags = 0; > > + u32 val; > > + > > + if (!(divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE)) > > + return; > > + > > + if (divider->lock) > > + spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags); > > + else > > + __acquire(divider->lock); > > + > > + /* store the current div val */ > > + val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift; > > + val &= div_mask(divider->width); > > + divider->cached_val = val; > > + clk_writel(0, divider->reg); > > + > > + if (divider->lock) > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(divider->lock, flags); > > + else > > + __release(divider->lock); > > +} > > + > > +static int clk_divider_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw) > > +{ > > + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + if (!(divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE)) > > + return __clk_get_enable_count(hw->clk); > > The plan was to delete this API once OMAP stopped using it. > clk_hw_is_enabled() doesn't work? No, it did not work before because clk_hw_is_enabled will result in the dead loop by calling .is_enabled() callback again. That's why __clk_get_enable_count is used instead. However, with above new patch method, this issue was gone. > > > + > > + val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift; > > + val &= div_mask(divider->width); > > + > > + return val ? 1 : 0; > > +} > > + > > const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ops = { > > .recalc_rate = clk_divider_recalc_rate, > > .round_rate = clk_divider_round_rate, > > .set_rate = clk_divider_set_rate, > > + .enable = clk_divider_enable, > > + .disable = clk_divider_disable, > > + .is_enabled = clk_divider_is_enabled, > > }; > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_divider_ops); > > > > @@ -436,6 +525,7 @@ static struct clk_hw *_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name, > > struct clk_divider *div; > > struct clk_hw *hw; > > struct clk_init_data init; > > + u32 val; > > int ret; > > > > if (clk_divider_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK) { > > @@ -468,6 +558,12 @@ static struct clk_hw *_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name, > > div->hw.init = &init; > > div->table = table; > > > > + if (div->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ZERO_GATE) { > > + val = clk_readl(reg) >> shift; > > + val &= div_mask(width); > > + div->cached_val = val; > > + } > > What if it isn't on? Setting cached_val to 0 is ok? > If it isn't on, then the cache_val should be 0. And recalc_rate will catch this case and return 0 as there's no proper pre-set rate. Regards Dong Aisheng > > + > > /* register the clock */ > > hw = &div->hw; > > ret = clk_hw_register(dev, hw); > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project