Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:57:36 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Felix Brack <fb@ltec.ch>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org,
        jingoohan1@gmail.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for ORISE OTM3225A LCD SoC
Message-ID: <20171220165736.e247aggbkl4qir23@oak.lan>
References: <1509714581-4065-1-git-send-email-fb@ltec.ch>
 <cde8376c-8217-6cfd-0a0a-b90b75892bea@ltec.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cde8376c-8217-6cfd-0a0a-b90b75892bea@ltec.ch>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1144
Lines: 29

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:35:24PM +0100, Felix Brack wrote:
> Just a gentle echo request ;-)
> Is there something completely wrong with this patch or am I just too
> impatient?
> 
> regards Felix
> 
> On 03.11.2017 14:09, Felix Brack wrote:
> > This patch adds a LCD driver supporting the OTM3225A LCD SoC
> > from ORISE Technology. This device can drive TFT LC panels having a
> > resolution of 240x320 pixels. After initializing the OTM3225A using
> > it's SPI interface it switches to use 16-bib RGB as external
> > display interface.

Was this a backlight driver? I've just noticed all the backlight
maintainers on Cc: but the subject doesn't make this obvious and even
with you quoting the patch header I still can't be entirely sure!

As a result I think its very likely the patch simply got overlooked
because it didn't look much like a backlight driver when filtering
e-mail. Patches that can't be easily categorized from the subject
line will often get overlooked.

So, asssuming this was a backlight driver, could you resend the patch
with an updated description and a subject line commenting:
[PATCH] backlight: otm3225a:


Daniel.