Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755831AbdLVB7N (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:59:13 -0500 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:45738 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755153AbdLVB7L (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 20:59:11 -0500 Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the keystone tree To: Tony Lindgren , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kishon Vijay Abraham I References: <20171222084545.5bab63b5@canb.auug.org.au> <20171221231253.GX3875@atomide.com> From: Santosh Shilimkar Organization: Oracle Corporation Message-ID: <2ec2df22-0f65-daf1-fe20-2dc3ad75f9cd@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:58:59 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171221231253.GX3875@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8752 signatures=668651 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1712220024 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1307 Lines: 36 On 12/21/2017 3:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Stephen Rothwell [171221 21:48]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in: >> >> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> >> between commit: >> >> d3b15c54ed7e ("ARM: config: sync multi-v7 config with keystone peripherals") >> >> from the keystone tree and commit: >> >> d03366dcbffc ("ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable CONFIG_PCI_DRA7XX (Host & Device modes)") >> >> from the omap tree. >> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This >> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial >> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree >> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating >> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly >> complex conflicts. > > Thanks I'll wait on this one so Kishon can check the resulting next. > > Santosh, the removal of CONFIG_PCI in multi_v7_defconfig looks a bit > suspcicious to me, care to check if commit d3b15c54ed7e is correct? > I just used savedefconfig so not sure why some of those needed ones got knocked off. For now, I will drop the v7_defconfig patch and post it separately later post merge window. Regards, Santosh