Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755700AbdLVH7l (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 02:59:41 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:32836 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752626AbdLVH7k (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 02:59:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:59:34 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Brendan Jackman , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched: Add NOHZ_STATS_KICK Message-ID: <20171222075934.f6yenvcb2zkf2ysd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20171221102139.177253391@infradead.org> <20171221102235.088181011@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 261 Lines: 6 On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 05:56:32PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > In fact, we can't only rely on the tick and newly_idle load balance to > ensure a period update of the blocked load because they can never > happen. I'm confused, why would the ilb not happen?