Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271653AbTGRAaA (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:30:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271659AbTGRAaA (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:30:00 -0400 Received: from web60004.mail.yahoo.com ([216.109.116.227]:43891 "HELO web60004.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S271653AbTGRA37 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:29:59 -0400 Message-ID: <20030718004454.81385.qmail@web60004.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 01:44:54 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Steven=20Newbury?= Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] BadRAM for 2.6.0-test1* To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 688 Lines: 19 I have come to the conclusion after more testing that there is definately a major bug in the patch. It results in many oopses on my system. However, I haven't been able to trace it yet. Could someone please look over the patch and see if there are any glaring mistakes. Thanks. ===== Steve __________________________________________________ Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/